Specter Law Would Let Investors Sue Fraud Accomplices

Specter Law Would Let Investors Sue Fraud Accomplices - 8/4/2009

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright © 2001
Stanford Law School

2009 News and Press Releases

SEARCH

News	News 2009
HEADLINES \| SETTLEMENTS AND DISMISSALS \| COURT FILINGS LINKS TO OTHER NEWS \| NEWS ARCHIVE	HEADLINES ARCHIVED SETTLEMENTS AND DISMISSALS ARCHIVED

HEADLINE NEWS:

Specter Law Would Let Investors Sue Fraud Accomplices
Joshua Gallu

Bloomberg. August 4, 2009
_________________________________________________________________________

EXCERPT: U.S. Senator Arlen Specter introduced legislation to let investors sue law firms, accountants and investment banks that helped perpetrate fraud, seeking to overcome recent Supreme Court limits on such cases. The measure would make individuals or firms that provide “substantial assistance” in a fraud subject to investor lawsuits, Specter, a Pennsylvania Democrat, said on the Senate floor last week. The Supreme Court has decided two cases since 1994 that restrict investors from recouping losses from fraud accomplices. The House isn’t considering similar legislation. “It would be an appropriate change,” said Donald Langevoort, a securities law professor at Georgetown University. “Secondary actors who play a big enough role in perpetrating a fraud should bear responsibility just like anyone else and shouldn’t be able to hide.” Shareholders are barred from suing parties that have only an indirect role in a fraud after Supreme Court decisions that limited liability to those directly and publicly involved in the scheme. The Specter measure would upend rulings in Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta Inc. of 2008 and Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver. Prior to the rulings, investor lawsuits against fraud accomplices were common, Langevoort said. The 1994 Central Bank decision was a “major gift” to individuals and corporations that aided in a fraud, he said. “There’s not going to be any real functional limit to who they could go after,” said Matthew Webb, senior vice president for legal reform policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform. The bill may spur lawsuits, he said. […] The Securities and Exchange Commission plans to weigh in this week on an investor lawsuit against Joseph Collins, Refco Inc.’s former outside lawyer, and his law firm, Mayer Brown LLP, said Salvatore Graziano, a lawyer at Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP in New York representing the plaintiffs.

Back to News page | Back to Archived News 2009 page | Back to Top

�