Loss Causation, Falsity Of Reports Not Shown In Suit Claiming Shares Bought At Artificially Inflated Price - 1/26/2006

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright © 2001
Stanford Law School


2006 News and Press Releases

News News 2006


DISMISSAL NEWS:

Loss Causation, Falsity Of Reports Not Shown In Suit Claiming Shares Bought At Artificially Inflated Price
Judge Sweet

New York Law Journal. January 26, 2006

_________________________________________________________________________

EXCERPT: Joffee v. Lehman Brothers Inc.--Defendants Lehman Brothers Inc., Kenneth N. Goldman, M.D., and David Gruber, M.D. (collectively 'Lehman' or the 'Defendants ') have moved pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (the 'PSLRA') to dismiss the third amended complaint ('TAC' or 'Complaint') of David Joffee and thirty-six other individuals, and a subchapter 5 corporation (the 'Plaintiffs'). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted. … In sum, Plaintiffs have failed to plead loss causation because they have not alleged and cannot allege that Lehman's allegedly false predictions about the demand for Sunrise products actually caused the demand for Sunrise products to decline and the stock price of Sunrise to suffer. Conclusion Based on the foregoing, Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint is granted. It is so ordered.

Back to News page | Back to Archived News 2006 page | Back to Top