N.Y. High Court Resolves Issue On Insurer And Attorney Fees - 12/20/2004

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright © 2001
Stanford Law School


2004 News and Press Releases

News News 2004


HEADLINE NEWS:

N.Y. High Court Resolves Issue On Insurer And Attorney Fees
John Caher – New York Law Journal

Law.com. December 20, 2004

_________________________________________________________________________

EXCERPT: Resolving an attorney fee issue that had split federal and state trial courts, the Court of Appeals Thursday held that fees are available where an insurer disclaiming coverage nonetheless provides a defense to its insured. U.S. Underwriters Insurance Co. v. City Club Hotel came to Albany via the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which sought clarification of New York law. The matter stemmed from a federal suit involving a construction accident in April 2000. Court records show that a worker was hurt while renovating a West 44th Street building owned by Shelby Realty where the City Club Hotel was a tenant. U.S. Underwriters Insurance Co. had issued a general liability policy to City Club and Shelby. Construction worker Marek Szpakowski fell from the scaffold and was injured during a time the policy was in effect. About five months after receiving notice of claim, the insurance company disclaimed coverage of Shelby and City Club based on an exclusion in the policy. It brought suit in U.S. District Court seeking a declaratory judgment that it had no duty to defend. At the same time, however, it defended Shelby Realty in a personal injury action. The federal trial court said the insurer did have a duty to defend, but it denied the insured's application for attorney fees and other costs it incurred defending itself against Underwriters declaratory judgment action. The federal appellate court agreed that Underwriters had a duty to defend, but said it was unclear as a matter of state law whether the defendants were entitled to counsel fees. Previously, the court had held that an insured who prevails in a declaratory judgment action where an insurance carrier denies a duty to defend is entitled to attorney fees.

Back to News page | Back to Archived News 2004 page | Back to Top