Help Wanted: Board Directors - 12/09/2003

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright © 2001
Stanford Law School


2003 News and Press Releases

News News 2003


HEADLINE:

Help Wanted: Board Directors
By: Aude Lagorce


Forbes.com. December 9, 2003

_________________________________________________________________________

EXCERPT: Despite shattering investors' confidence, the spate of corporate scandals that recently swept through the U.S. has had one positive consequence: companies have had to redefine the role of their corporate boards and the responsibilities of those who sit on them. With the collapse of giants such as WorldCom or Enron, shareholders lost not only their investments, but their trust in star-studded corporate boards protecting their interests. Soon after light was shed on the multiple conflicts of interest haunting the workings of boards, corporate governance screws were tightened sharply: The Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance reforms were passed in 2002 and the Securities and Exchange Commission approved new listing requirements for the New York Stock Exchange last month. "Up until then, boards were considered parsley on the fish," says Charles Elson, a member of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. "Now they are a credible counterweight to management." Indeed, at the price of a serious power shift, boards have been transformed into far more responsible monitors of a company's procedures. The new rules, however, place such a liability burden on board directors that recruiting them has become almost an impossible task. "The traditional pool of candidates has shrunk," says Julie Daum, practice leader for North American board services with search executive firm Spencer Stuart. "We have spent an awful lot of time this year looking for people to serve on boards in general and on financial committees in particular." Traditionally, companies have looked for chief executives of firms larger than themselves to sit on their boards. But because the workload has increased about 50% for directors since Sarbanes-Oxley was passed, few sitting CEOs can find the time to accept new positions on top of their current ones. Some directors are already clearly overworked: Consider Shirley Jackson, who sits on the boards of Medtronic (nyse: MDT - news - people ), AT&T (nyse: ATT - news - people ) and Fedex (nyse: FDX - news - people ) among others, or Vernon Jordan, who, on top of his day job at investment bank Lazard Freres, is on the boards of six companies including Sara Lee (nyse: SLE - news - people ), American Express (nyse: AXP - news - people ) and Xerox (nyse: XRX - news - people ) (see: Overworked Directors 2003). Maybe surprisingly, "We haven't seen many instances of directors quitting boards," says Corporate Board Member President T.K. Kerstetter, "but executives are much more wary of taking on additional positions than they used to be." A study by Korn/Ferry International released in October found that 23 % of directors of the top 1000 companies in the Americas turned down additional board roles in 2002, in comparison to just 13% the previous year.

Back to News page | Back to Archived News 2003 page | Back to Top