DESPITE SCANDALS, REASON TO HOPE, November 9, 2003

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright © 2001
Stanford Law School


2003 News and Press Releases

News News 2003


HEADLINE ARCHIVED:

DESPITE SCANDALS, REASON TO HOPE.
By: Dan Gillmor


San Jose Mercury News, November 9, 2003

_________________________________________________________________________

EXCERPT: If you own shares in one of the mutual funds that has been cheating small investors on behalf of favored clients and/or managers, you have every right to feel sick to your stomach -- and furious. This is betrayal on an epic scale. Epic, and depressing, because mutual funds were supposed to be the refuge for people like us. Now we learn that supposedly reputable funds have been just another cog in a financial wheel that, more and more, seems utterly rigged against everyone but the insiders. Is there anything we can trust? How many more shoes are left to drop? ``If you're waiting for the last shoe, you have to realize this might be a centipede,'' says Joseph A. Grundfest, who served on the Securities and Exchange Commission under Presidents Reagan and the senior George Bush. But Grundfest, now a professor of law and business at Stanford Law School, also urges a sense of perspective. This is the best advice of all at a time when it's tempting to see the entire market as hopelessly corrupt. Here's why I'm finally beginning to get optimistic, even amid an apparently endless parade of sleaze. American capitalism is peering over a cliff, but there have to be enough sane and honorable capitalists who won't let the bad guys pull everyone else over the edge. It's a binary choice. Small investors won't do the choosing, not in any immediate way. We have limited power, and if we all bail out of stocks and mutual funds we'll only hurt ourselves. No, in the immediate term we're going to have to rely on two groups of people: big investors, especially pension funds, and the vast majority of business people who have remained honorable despite the lure of a flawed system that has almost encouraged corruption. They aren't the crooks who have been occupying too many executive suites, and they aren't the manipulators who abuse trust through legal but unethical chicanery. But if they don't act, they will be culpable for the eventual collapse of investor confidence, and of the system itself. Several state pension funds have pulled their money out of the klepto-funds. That's a good start, but only a start. Institutional investors have been demanding better disclosure (though disclosure makes little difference when insiders are defrauding investors). They should gang up on executive-suite greed, too. Grossly excessive compensation is still endemic, and fundamentally outrageous. One of the largest institutional investors, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, or CalPERS, took a stand last week for a more honest system when it said so-called reforms at the New York Stock Exchange didn't go nearly far enough. The NYSE has been a promoter and a regulator, a blatant conflict of interest. One of the most disturbing facets of the ongoing parade of scandals has been the near-silence from high-profile executives. Their general unwillingness to go after their peers speaks volumes about their own values. But when it comes to really fixing things, big-time capitalists need to face an uncomfortable truth: They need more government, not less, at least when it comes to enforcing fair business practices and ethical behavior.

Back to News page | Back to Archived News 2003 page | Back to Top