The Year In Ideas: A To Z.; Blame The Brokers - 12/09/2001

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright © 2001
Stanford Law School

2001 News and Press Releases

Current News News 2001


HEADLINE ARCHIVED:

The Year In Ideas: A To Z.; Blame The Brokers
By: Richard Siklos


The New York Times. December 9, 2001

_________________________________________________________________________

Excerpt: When the irrational exuberance has vanished, taking with it $4 trillion of capital from the nation's stock markets, who is to blame? A growing army of bellicose investors has come to believe that the culprit is not impersonal market forces or their own excess greed -- it's the brokers who are to blame. Aggrieved investors argue that the way reputable Wall Street firms like Merrill Lynch and Credit Suisse First Boston pumped up Internet and technology stocks was no better than the notorious schemes of small-time "boiler rooms," and they've filed an array of class-action lawsuits against major Wall Street firms and a record number of individual claims with the National Association of Securities Dealers. According to the Fordham University securities-law professor Constantine Katsoris, a veteran N.A.S.D. arbitrator, a burst in client complaints always follows a slide in the market. This year's suits, however, make a specific and often compelling claim: Wall Street analysts hyped the very Internet stocks whose dubious I.P.O.'s their firms were underwriting. The other new twist is that some investors are actually collecting: a New York doctor, Debasis Kanjilal, captured Wall Street's attention in July when Merrill settled his arbitration case for $400,000.

Back to News page | Back to Archived News 2001 page | Back to Top