IPO Recusal Motion Backfires - 12/06/2001

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright © 2001
Stanford Law School

2001 News and Press Releases

Current News News 2001


HEADLINE ARCHIVED:

IPO Recusal Motion Backfires
By: Heidi Moore


The Daily Deal. December 6, 2001

_________________________________________________________________________

Excerpt: Thirty-eight investment bank defendants suggested that Judge Shira Scheindlin recuse herself from overseeing scores of class-action lawsuits centering on IPO Allocations. Where does it leave you when you try to get a judge tossed off a case and it doesn't work? Nowhere you'd want to be. But that is exactly where 38 investment bank defendants are, after suggesting in late September that Judge Shira Scheindlin recuse herself from overseeing scores of class-action lawsuits centering on initial public offering allocations. Last week, Scheindlin, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, rejected the recusal motion made by underwriters named as defendants in about 1,000 lawsuits filed by investors who bought shares in hot IPOs. Now the banks' failed request could come back to haunt them.

Back to News page | Back to Archived News 2001 page | Back to Top