Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 01/07/2021 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: December 10, 2020

According to the Complaint, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (“SMIC” or the “Company”) purports to be an investment holding company principally engaged in the computer-aided design, manufacture, testing, packaging and trading of integrated circuits (“IC”), as well as the provision of other semiconductor services. The Company is also involved in the design and manufacture of semiconductor masks and various types of wafers. The Company distributes its products in China and to overseas markets, such as the Europe and the United States.

The Complaint alleges Defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) there was an “unacceptable risk” that equipment supplied to SMIC would be used for military purposes; (2) SMIC was foreseeably at risk of facing U.S. restrictions; (3) as a result of restrictions by the U.S. Department of Commerce, certain of SMIC’s suppliers would need “difficult-to-obtain” individual export licenses; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Semiconductors
Headquarters: China

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: SMICY
Company Market: OTC-BB
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 20-CV-11219
JUDGE: Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
DATE FILED: 12/10/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/23/2020
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/26/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (New Los Angeles)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available