Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 09/30/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: September 29, 2020

According to the Complaint, Pintec Technology Holdings Limited is purportedly a technology platform that enables financial services in China by connecting business partners and financial partners with users.

This is a class action on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Pintec securities pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with the Company’s October 2018 initial public offering. In October 2018, Pintec completed its IPO in which it sold more than 3.7 million American Depositary Shares at $11.88 per share.

The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement was false and misleading and omitted to state material facts. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that the Company erroneously recorded revenue earned from certain technical service fee on a net basis, rather than a gross basis; (2) that there were material weaknesses in Pintec’s internal control over financial reporting related to cash advances outside the normal course of business to Jimu Group, a related party, and to a non-routine loan financing transaction with a third-party entity, Plutux Labs; (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s financial results for fiscal 2017 and 2018 had been misstated; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services
Headquarters: China

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: PT
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 20-CV-08062
JUDGE: Hon. Jesse M. Furman
DATE FILED: 09/29/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 10/25/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/29/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (NY)
  2. Law Offices of Howard G. Smith
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available