On or around 01/04/2021 (Date of last review)
Filing Date: August 24, 2020
According to the Complaint, Blink Charging Company purports to be “a leading owner, operator, and provider of electric vehicle (‘EV’) charging equipment and networked charging services. Blink offers both residential and commercial EV charging equipment, enabling EV drivers to easily recharge at various location types.”
The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants misled investors by misrepresenting and/or failing to disclose that: (i) many of Blink’s charging stations are damaged, neglected, non-functional, inaccessible, nor non-accessible; (ii) Blink’s purported partnerships and expansions with other companies were overstated; (iii) the purported growth of the Company’s network has been overstated; (iv) as a result, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
On September 30, 2020, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases. On December 21, the Court issued an Order appointing Co-Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: Blink Charging Company
Industry: Retail (Specialty)
Headquarters: United States
Ticker Symbol: BLNK
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
Richard Maurice Bush, et al. v. Blink Charging Company, et al.
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 20-CV-23527
JUDGE: Hon. Kathleen M. Williams
DATE FILED: 08/24/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/06/2020
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/19/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Block & Leviton LLP (Boston)
Cullin O'Brien Law, P.A.
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
Related District Court Filings
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available