Processing your request


please wait...

 | Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

Baidu, Inc.

Case Summary

Baidu, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 08/19/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: August 19, 2020

According to the Complaint, Baidu, Inc. purports to provide Internet search services in China and internationally. It operates through two segments, one of which is iQIYI. The iQIYI segment provides online entertainment service, including original and licensed content; membership services; and online advertising services. The Company was formerly known as Baidu.com, Inc. and changed its name to Baidu, Inc. in December 2008.

The Complaint alleges that Defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Baidu misrepresented the financial and business condition of iQIYI; (2) iQIYI had inadequate controls; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times. According to the Complaint, these true details were disclosed by a market research firm.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: Baidu, Inc.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Communications Services
Headquarters: China

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: BIDU
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Ganesan Alagappan, et al. v. Baidu, Inc., et al.

COURT: E.D. New York
DOCKET #: 20-CV-03794
JUDGE: Hon. Roslynn R. Mauskopf
DATE FILED: 08/19/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/08/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/13/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (NY)
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws 08/19/2020
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 08/19/2020

Reference Complaint

—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases