Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 07/22/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: June 10, 2020

According to the Complaint, Forescout Technologies, Inc. provides “security at first sight” by delivering software that enables device visibility and control that enables enterprises and government agencies to gain improved situational awareness of their environment (devices on their networks) and orchestrate actions to reduce cyber and operational risk.

The Complaint alleges that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and omissions of material facts regarding the significant and disproportionate decline in Forescout’s financial performance and the related risk Forescout’s planned acquisition by Advent International Corp. would not close. As a result, Class members that purchased Forescout common stock during the Class Period did so at artificially inflated prices.

Specifically, the Complaint alleges that by the start of the Class Period on February 6, 2020 – when Forescout announced the Merger Agreement with Advent and positive fourth quarter 2019 earnings— Forescout knew that its business had begun to suffer a dramatic and undisclosed downturn, including it its fast-growing Asia Pacific and Japan (“APJ”) region that was impacted by COVID19 starting in January. In addition, Forescout was aware that its fourth quarter 2019 revenues were inflated through an abnormal transaction with one of its largest resale customers, Merlin International Inc., which a whistleblower has alleged to Advent was the result of a “channel stuffing scheme” in the fourth quarter of 2019. Because of these factors, Forescout knew that the consummation of the Transaction was exceptionally risky at the time it announced the Merger Agreement.

Forescout neither disclosed these facts to investors nor Advent at the time it signed the Merger Agreement. Nor did Forescout disclose that its financial collapse would preclude the availability of the debt financing needed to close the transaction. In fact, while Forescout provided certain revised projections during the sales process to bidders, it did not disclose the true known extent of its financial downturn, including the early impacts of COVID-19 on the APJ region, nor the abnormal transaction with Merlin.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: FSCT
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 20-CV-03819
JUDGE: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
DATE FILED: 06/10/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/06/2020
CLASS PERIOD END: 05/15/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Entwistle & Cappucci LLP (New York)
  2. Susman Godfrey LLP
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available