Processing your request


please wait...

 | Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

Quantstamp, Inc.

Case Summary

Quantstamp, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 09/16/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: April 03, 2020

According to the Complaint, Quantstamp, Inc. is a blockchain-focused software development company that develops blockchain security solutions and is developing and promoting the Quantstamp blockchain protocol.

The Complaint alleges that within the Class Period, Quantstamp and the Individual Defendants promoted, offered, and sold Quantstamp’s securities, called QSP tokens, throughout the United States, in violation of federal and state securities laws. Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of investors who purchased QSP tokens in the United States (the “Class”), brings claims to recover the consideration paid for the QSP tokens, together with interest thereon, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs.

Plaintiffs filed an amended Complaint on September 11, 2020. On September 14, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: Quantstamp, Inc.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: N/A
Company Market: N/A
Market Status: N/A

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Chase Williams, et al. v. Quantstamp, Inc., et al.

COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 20-CV-02813
JUDGE: Hon. Loretta A. Preska
DATE FILED: 04/03/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/17/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/03/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Roche Cyrulnik Freedman LLP
  2. Selendy & Gay, PLLC
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Class Action Complaint 04/03/2020
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 04/04/2020

Reference Complaint

Matthew Kuzmeskas, et al. v. Quantstamp, Inc., et al.

COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 20-CV-02813
JUDGE: Hon. Loretta A. Preska
DATE FILED: 09/11/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/17/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/11/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Roche Cyrulnik Freedman LLP
  2. Selendy & Gay, PLLC
Reference Complaint (REF) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Amended Class Action Complaint 09/11/2020
2 Order Appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Approving Selection of Co-Lead Counsel 09/14/2020
3 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 09/16/2020

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases