Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 04/04/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: April 03, 2020

According to the Complaint, KayDex Pte. Ltd. (“Kyber” or “Kyber Network”) describes itself as an “on-chain liquidity protocol that aggregates liquidity from a wide range of reserves, powering instant and secure token exchange in any decentralized application.”

The Complaint alleges that within the Class Period, Kyber Network and the individual Defendants promoted, offered, and sold Kyber Network’s securities, called Kyber Network Crystal (KNC) tokens, throughout the United States, in violation of federal and state securities laws. Plaintiff individually and on behalf of investors who purchased KNC tokens in the United States (the “Class”) brings claims to recover the consideration paid for the KNC tokens, together with interest thereon, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services
Headquarters: Singapore

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: N/A
Company Market: N/A
Market Status: N/A

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 20-CV-02812
JUDGE: Hon. Ronnie Abrams
DATE FILED: 04/03/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/15/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/03/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Roche Cyrulnik Freedman LLP
  2. Selendy & Gay, PLLC
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available