Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 10/01/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: April 01, 2020

According to the Complaint, Mesa Air Group Incorporated operates as the holding company for Mesa Airlines, Inc., which provides regional air carrier services under capacity purchase agreements (“CPA”) with American Airlines and United Airlines.

On or about July 13, 2018, Mesa Air Group filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-1, which in combination with subsequent amendments of Forms S1/A and filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), would be used for the IPO.

In August 2018, Defendants held the IPO, offering approximately 11 million shares of common stock to the investing public at $12.00 per share.

The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement featured false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Mesa Air Group's operational performance was poor and below industry standards; (2) Mesa Air Group had a shortage of qualified mechanics and maintenance personnel; (3) Mesa Air Group had an inadequate number of spare aircraft and parts; (4) Mesa Air Group did not have a strong track record of reliable performance; (5) then-existing "risks" had already materialized; (6) Mesa Air Group knew of undisclosed adverse trends and uncertainties at the time of the IPO; and (7) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.

On June 22, 2020, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on August 17.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Transportation
Industry: Airline
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: MESA
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Arizona
DOCKET #: 20-CV-00648
JUDGE: Hon. Douglas L Rayes
DATE FILED: 04/01/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/10/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/01/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (NY)
  2. Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: D. Arizona
DOCKET #: 20-CV-00648
JUDGE: Hon. Douglas L Rayes
DATE FILED: 08/17/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/10/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/01/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy, P.C.
  2. Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available