Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 04/01/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: April 01, 2020

According to the Complaint, Legg Mason, Inc. helps investors globally achieve better financial outcomes by expanding choice across investment strategies, vehicles, and investor access through independent investment managers with diverse expertise in equity, fixed income, alternative, and liquidity investments.

This action stems from a proposed transaction announced on February 18, 2020, pursuant to which Legg Mason, Inc. will be acquired by Franklin Resources, Inc. On February 17, 2020, Legg Mason’s Board of Directors caused the Company to enter into an agreement and plan of merger with Franklin. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Legg Mason’s stockholders will receive $50.00 in cash for each share of Legg Mason common stock they own.

On March 27, 2020, Defendants filed a proxy statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Proposed Transaction. The Complaint alleges that the Proxy Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Proxy Statement false and misleading. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that the Proxy Statement fails to disclose: (i) all line items used to calculate (a) adjusted EBITDA and (b) unlevered free cash flow and (ii) a reconciliation of all non-GAAP to GAAP metrics and omits material information regarding the analyses performed by the Company’s financial advisors in connection with the Proposed Transaction.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Misc. Financial Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: LM
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Delaware
DOCKET #: 20-CV-00462
JUDGE: Hon. Colm F. Connolly
DATE FILED: 04/01/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/18/2020
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/01/2020
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. (Wilmington)
  2. RM Law, P.C. (Berwyn)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available