Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


YPF Sociedad Anonima : American Depositary Shares
Summary: According to the law firm press release, the complaint charges YPF, certain of its officers and directors and the underwriters of the Offering with violations of the Securities Act. YPF describes itself as “Argentina’s leading energy company, operating a fully integrated oil and gas chain with leading market positions” in the exploration, development and production of crude oil, natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas, and the refining, marketing, transportation and distribution of energy based products.

On or about November 26, 2010, YPF filed a Form F-3 Registration Statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the Offering with the SEC. On or about March 23, 2011, the Prospectus with respect to the Offering, which forms part of the Registration Statement, became effective and more than 26.2 million shares of YPF ADSs were sold to the public at $41 per share, thereby valuing the total size of the Offering at more than $1 billion.

The complaint alleges that the Registration Statement, and the documents referenced and incorporated therein, contained numerous untrue statements of material facts and omitted to state material facts required to be stated therein in order to make the statements contained therein not misleading. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Registration Statement failed to disclose and misrepresented the following adverse facts, among others, which existed at the time of the Offering: (i) that the Company faced a risk of nationalization by the Argentinean government; (ii) that the risk of nationalization had increased because of the Company’s failure to: (a) adequately produce oil and gas within Argentina; and (b) reinvest a substantial portion of its profits back into the Company and its operations; (iii) that the Company was in breach of its concession contracts with various Argentinean provinces; and (iv) that nationalization by the Argentinean government would likely have a severe adverse effect on shareholders and on the Company’s market value. According to the complaint, the instructions and regulations that govern the preparation of the Registration Statement require that YPF disclose the facts detailed above. The Registration Statement, however, failed to include these material facts.

On May 14, 2013, the Court appointed Lead Plaintiff pursuant to 15 U.S.c. §§77z1 (a)(3)(B) and 78u-4(a)(3)(B); and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is hereby appointed Lead Counsel for the class pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§77z-1(a)(3)(B)(v) and 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v).

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 2911
Sector: Energy
Industry: Oil & Gas - Integrated


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: YPF Sociedad Anonima
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: YPF
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.ypf.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Monroe County Employees' Retirement System, et al. v. YPF Sociedad Anonima, et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 13-CV-00842
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin
 DATE FILED: 02/05/2013  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 03/23/2011  CLASS PERIOD END: 02/05/2013
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173,
  • VanOverbeke Michaud & Timmony, P.C.
      79 Alfred Street, Detroit, MI, 48201
       (voice) 313.578.1200, (fax) 313.578.1200,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/05/2013
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 02/05/2013

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Monroe County Employees' Retirement System, et al. v. , et al.
     COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 13-CV-00842
     JUDGE NAME: 
     DATE FILED: 06/06/2013  SOURCE: 
     CLASS PERIOD START: 12/22/2009  CLASS PERIOD END: 04/16/2012
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Amended and Consolidated
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Francisco)
      100 Pine Street, Suite 2600, San Francisco, CA, 94111
       (voice) 415.288.4545, (fax) 415.288.4534,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    [Proposed] Order Consolidating the Actions, Appointing Lead Plaintiff and Approving of Selection of Lead Counsel
    Type: Order Date on the document: 05/14/2013

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top