Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Rodman & Renshaw, LLC : Yuhe International, Inc. (Secondary Offering)
Summary: According to the complaint, it is alleged that investors in Yuhe's secondary offering made on or about October 20, 2010 were misled by a series of materially false and misleading statements concerning Yuhe's business. Defendants failed to make a reasonable investigation into or, alternatively, did not possess reasonable grounds to believe that the statements contained in the Prospectus Supplement were true. Yuhe reported the purchase of thirteen breeder farms from Weifang Dajiang Corporation in December 2009 for approximately $15 million and further represented that these farms were contributing to the revenue of the Company in 2010 when in fact the purchase did not occur and the 80% initial down payment of $12.1 million to purchase the farms had been transferred from the Company's books to a private account of Yuhe's CEO. It was not until nearly eighteen months later, on June 13, 2011, that the market first obtained any information relating to Yuhe's material misrepresentation. On that date, an investment fund, Geoinvesting, issued a report stating that it had conducted its own investigation into the reported December 2009 purchase of the thirteen breeder farms and found evidence showing that the transaction did not occur.

The complaint alleges that Yuhe finally admitted on June 17, 2011 that the purchase had not occurred and its CEO and CAO had taken $12.1 million from Yuhe and placed it in a separate account whereby the CEO purportedly attempted, beginning in March 2010, to purchase thirteen different farms in an effort to cover-up the illusory nature of the Dajiang transaction.

On June 16, 2011, Yuhe's stock dropped almost 52% from its June 15, 2011 closing price of $4.08 per share, to $1.96 per share. The stock dropped 38% from June 16 to June 17, 2011, to $1.2099 per share, when trading was halted by NASDAQ. Between June 15 and 17, 2011, Yuhe's common stock lost more than 70% of its value.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 2015
Sector:
Industry:


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Rodman & Renshaw, LLC
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: YUII
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.yuhepoultry.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
aAd Partners LP, et al. v. Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, et al.
 COURT: C.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-00928
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. David O. Carter
 DATE FILED: 06/11/2012  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 10/20/2010  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/20/2010
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP
      595 Market Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA, 94105-2835
       (voice) 800.778.1822, (fax) 415.777.5189, info@gbcsf.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/11/2012
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 06/11/2012

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top