Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Monster Beverage Corporation
Summary: According to the law firm press release, Monster markets and distributes energy drinks, fruit juice, smoothies, juice cocktails, iced teas, lemonades, and still water. The Company distributes its beverages in the United States and overseas.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, the Company made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was improperly advertising, marketing and promoting its Monster Energy® brand of energy drinks; and (ii) as a result of the above, the Company’s financial statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On August 8, 2012, after the market closed, the Company disclosed financial results that failed to meet analysts’ expectations. On this news, Monster stock declined $6.57 per share or nearly 10%, to close at $61.20 per share on August 9, 2012.

The next day, after the market closed, the Company disclosed that it had “received a subpoena from a state attorney general in connection with an investigation concerning the Company’s advertising, marketing, promotion, ingredients, usage and sale of its Monster Energy® brand of energy drinks.” On this news, Monster stock declined an additional $6.93 per share or nearly 11%, to close at $54.27 per share on August 10, 2012.

On September 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Notice voluntarily dismissing this action without prejudice as to all defendants.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 2086
Sector: Consumer Non-Cyclical
Industry: Beverages (Non-Alcoholic)


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Monster Beverage Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: MNST
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.monsterbevcorp.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Daniel H. Rausch, et al. v. Monster Beverage Corporation, et al.
 COURT: S.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-02058
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. M. James Lorenz
 DATE FILED: 08/21/2012  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 02/23/2012  CLASS PERIOD END: 08/09/2012
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP (New York)
      100 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY, 10017-5516
       (voice) 212.661.1100, (fax) 212.661.8665, info@pomerantzlaw.com/
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 08/21/2012
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 08/21/2012
    Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. CIV. P.41(a)(1)(A)
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 09/13/2012

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top