Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Chanticleer Holdings, Inc.
Summary: According to the law firm press release, the complaint charges that Chanticleer falsely represented that the financial statements for its South African operations, accounting for a majority of Chanticleer's revenues, had been audited. In reality, they had not been audited. When Chanticleer revealed that the financial statements for its South African operations had not been audited, the NASDAQ halted trading in Chanticleer's stock and warrants.

On January 04, 2013, the Plaintiff Francis Howard was appointed to serve as lead plaintiff in this action with The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., being approved to serve as lead counsel for theproposed class.

On February 19, 2013, an Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws was filed by the lead plaintiff against the defendants.

On May 17, 2013, a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants Dawson James Securities, Inc. and Merriman Capital Inc. Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(A)(1)(A). On May 22, 2013, the court issued an Order Dismissing Defendants Dawson James Securities, Inc., and Merriman Capital, Inc.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 8742
Sector: Financial
Industry: Misc. Financial Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Chanticleer Holdings, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: HOTR
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.chanticleerholdings.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Francis Howard, et al. v. Chanticleer Holdings, Inc., et al.
 COURT: S.D. Florida  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-81123
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. James I. Cohn
 DATE FILED: 10/12/2012  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 06/21/2012  CLASS PERIOD END: 09/10/2012
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • The Rosen Law Firm P.A. (New York)
      275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) (212) 686-1060, (fax) (212) 202-3827,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/12/2012
    Order Appointing Lead Plaintiff, Approving Lead Counsel and Resetting Calendar Call and Trial Date
    Type: Order Date on the document: 01/04/2013

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Francis Howard, et al. v. Chanticleer Holdings, Inc., et al.
     COURT: S.D. Florida  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-81123
     JUDGE NAME: 
     DATE FILED: 02/19/2013  SOURCE: 
     CLASS PERIOD START: 06/21/2012  CLASS PERIOD END: 09/10/2012
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Amended
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • The Rosen Law Firm P.A. (New York)
      275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) (212) 686-1060, (fax) (212) 202-3827,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Amended Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/19/2013
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 02/22/2013
    Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants Dawson James Securities, Inc. and Merriman Capital Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 05/17/2013
    Order Dismissing Defendants Dawson James Securities, Inc., and Merriman Capital, Inc.
    Type: Order Date on the document: 05/22/2013

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top