Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


SmartHeat, Inc.
Summary: According to the law firm press release, the complaint charges that Heat's Chief Executive Officer sold $23 million of his shares during the Class Period, in violation of several SEC rules. This rapid sale of HEAT's stock onto the market caused its stock price to plummet.

On December 14, 2012, the Court issued an Order appointing lead plaintiff and approving the selection of lead counsel. On January 28, 2013, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On February 6, lead plaintiff filed a corrected version of the complaint.

On April 8, 2013, the lead plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3433
Sector: Capital Goods
Industry: Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: SmartHeat, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: HEAT
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.smartheatinc.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Steve Leshinsky, et al. v. James Jun Wang, et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-06682
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer
 DATE FILED: 08/31/2012  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 02/24/2010  CLASS PERIOD END: 05/03/2010
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • The Rosen Law Firm P.A. (New York)
      275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) (212) 686-1060, (fax) (212) 202-3827,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 08/31/2012
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 08/31/2012
    Order Appointing Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel
    Type: Order Appointing LP/LC Date on the document: 12/14/2012

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Stream SICAV, et al. v. SmartHeat, Inc., et al.
     COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-06682
     JUDGE NAME: 
     DATE FILED: 01/28/2013  SOURCE: 
     CLASS PERIOD START: 02/24/2010  CLASS PERIOD END: 05/30/2012
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Amended
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP (New York)
      100 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY, 10017-5516
       (voice) 212.661.1100, (fax) 212.661.8665, info@pomerantzlaw.com/
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    First Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/28/2013
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 02/04/2013
    [Corrected] First Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/06/2013
    Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/08/2013

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top