Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


General Maritime Corporation
Summary: According to the complaint, General Maritime purports to be a leading crude and products tanker company serving principally within the Atlantic basin which includes ports in the Caribbean, South and Central America, the United States, West Africa, the Mediterranean, Europe and the North Sea.

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements and omitted material information regarding the Company's business and financial results. As a result of defendants' false statements and omissions, General Maritime stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $7.87 per share on June 11, 2010.

On September 21, 2012, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases, appointing lead plaintiff, and approving the selection of lead counsel.

On November 15, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 4412
Sector:
Industry:


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: General Maritime Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: GMRRQ
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.generalmaritimecorp.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Ken Phipps, et al. v. John P. Tavlarios, et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-04599
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Alison J. Nathan
 DATE FILED: 06/12/2012  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 05/10/2010  CLASS PERIOD END: 11/16/2011
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. (Garden City)
      585 Stewart Avenue, Suite 304, Garden City, NY, 11530
       (voice) (516) 683-3516, (fax) ,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/12/2012
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 06/12/2012
    Order Appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Approving Lead Plaintiffs' Selection of Lead Counsel
    Type: Order Appointing LP/LC Date on the document: 09/21/2012

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    In re GMR Securities Litigation
     COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-04599
     JUDGE NAME: 
     DATE FILED: 11/15/2012  SOURCE: 
     CLASS PERIOD START: 05/10/2010  CLASS PERIOD END: 11/16/2011
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Amended and Consolidated
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (New York)
      270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 10/25/2012
    Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 11/15/2012

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top