Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Centene Corporation
Summary: According to a press release issued June 29, 2012, Centene operates as a multiline healthcare company in the United States. On June 11, 2012, the Company's stock price plunged over 22% after the Company cut its full-year profit and revenue forecasts due to higher-than-expected medical costs. Centene revised its projections to earnings of $1.45 to $1.65 per share for 2012 versus a previous forecast of $2.64 to $2.84 per share. In addition, the Company also disclosed that expenses were above projections for commercial polices sold by its Celtic Insurance unit and Centene was evaluating goodwill and intangible assets at the unit that may result in a non-cash charge of about $28 million. The complaint alleges that Centene misrepresented its financial condition and failed to inform investors that the Company's 2012 outlook, provided at the start of the Class Period, lacked a reasonable basis when made due to already existing and understood competitive pressures.

According to the notice entered into the Court's docket on September 21, 2012, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action without prejudice as to all claims an d Defendants.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code:
Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare Facilities


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Centene Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: CNC
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.centene.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Neil Webner, et al. v. Centene Corporation, et al.
 COURT: E.D. Missouri  DOCKET NUMBER: 12-CV-01173
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Catherine D. Perry
 DATE FILED: 06/29/2012  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 02/07/2012  CLASS PERIOD END: 06/08/2012
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Carey, Danis & Lowe
      8235 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO, 63105
       (voice) (314) 725-7700, (fax) (314) 721-0905,
  • Ryan & Maniskas, LLP
      995 Old Eagle School Rd., Ste. 311, Wayne, PA, 19087
       (voice) (484) 588-5516, (fax) (484) 450-2582,
  • Saxena White PA (Boca Raton)
      2424 N. Federal Highway, Suite 257, Boca Raton, FL, 33431
       (voice) 561.394.3399, (fax) 561.394.3399,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/29/2012
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 07/03/2012
    Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 09/21/2012

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top