 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
China-Biotics, Inc. Summary: According to the law firm press release, the complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, Defendants knew, or recklessly disregarded, that the Company fabricated (i) a false sales contract; (ii) a false bank website; and (iii) a false bank advice in furtherance of its scheme to fraudulently create the appearance of having achieved a 50% growth in 2011 revenue. As a result of the dissemination of the materially false and misleading information and failure to disclose material facts, the market price of China-Biotics common stock was artificially inflated during the Class Period.
On September 5, 2012, the Court issued an Order appointing lead plaintiff and approving the selection of lead counsel.
On October 18, 2012, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases. The Clerk of the Court was directed to designate 10 Civ. 7838 as the lead case and to terminate this case.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 1400
Sector:
Industry:
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | China-Biotics, Inc. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | CHBT |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.chn-biotics.com/ |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| David Casper, et al. v. Jinan, et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Civil Action | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 05/25/2012 | ||
| Memorandum And Order | |||
| Type: Order Appointing LP/LC | Date on the document: 09/05/2012 | ||
| Order | |||
| Type: Order of Consolidation | Date on the document: 10/18/2012 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 11/12/2012 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: | |||
| Type: | Date on the document: | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top