![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KIT Digital, Inc. Summary: According to the law firm press release, KIT digital and certain of its senior executives are charged with issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements, during the Class Period, in violation of federal securities laws. During the class period, KIT digital was engaged in acquiring and purportedly integrating companies that were in the business of marketing end-to-end technology platforms for IP based video content providers. Under the leadership of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, from May 2008 to May 2011, KIT digital acquired over a dozen other companies, using cash raised through equity sales and stock as acquisition currency. As a result of its purported success, KIT digital reported "record" setting financial results, and repeatedly upgraded its financial guidance, throughout the Class Period. The action charges that, on May 3, 2012, investors ultimately learned that KIT digital was operating far below guidance, and that the success of the integration and administration of its purchased assets had been overstated, and that the true costs of integrating and administering these acquisitions was understated. Based on the disparity between prior guidance and KIT digital's announced results for 1Q:12, on May 3, 2012, its shares declined precipitously - - falling to an intra-day low of $4.12 per share, compared to the prior day's close of $6.34 per share, on May 2, 2012. It was only at that time that investors first learned that: (i) KIT digital was not achieving its projected growth in earnings and revenues; (ii) the effectiveness of the integration of purchased companies had been materially overstated; (iii) KIT digital had materially overstated its foreseeable growth and profitability, and had falsely stated that the Company was poised to achieve significant financial success; and (iv) it was not true that KIT digital contained adequate systems of controls, such that KIT digital's representations and reports were true, accurate and reliable. On May 3, 2012, the Wall Street Journal published a critical report on KIT digital that concluded that the former CEO and board Chairman who unexpectedly resigned in April 2012, had "left a mess" at the Company. The Journal also reported that KIT digital's new CEO, would not endorse prior guidance. On September 28, 2012, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases, appointing lead plaintiff, and approving the selection of lead counsel. On January 3, 2013, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases. It was ordered that all filings in connection with the consolidated action be docketed against the remaining lower number cases, 12 civ. 4199. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the referenced higher numbered cases, 12 civ. 5446 and 12 civ. 8732, as separate actions and remove them from the Court's docket. The Court issued another Order consolidating cases on January 4. It was ordered that all filings in connection with the consolidated action be docketed against the remaining lower numbered case, 12 Civ. 4199; and it was ordered that the Clerk of Court close the referenced higher numbered case, 12 Civ. 9210 as a separate action and remove it from the Court's docket. INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION: SIC Code: 8900 Sector: Technology Industry: Computer Services
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful. Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||