Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Wells Fargo Bank : Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities Trust : Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR15
Summary: According to the complaint dated August 10, 2010, many of the facts related to the 2006-AR 15 Trust Series of Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates pursuant or traceable to Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation's September 20, 2006 Registration Statement, and the accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement. This action arises from the sale of approximately $400 million in mortgage pass-through certificates pursuant to the Registration Statement. The Certificates were supported by pools of mortgage loans that the parent company or its affiliates originated or purchased.

The Offering Documents contained untrue statements of material fact, or omitted to state material facts necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, regarding: (i) the underwriting standards purportedly used in connection with the origination of the underlying mortgages; (ii) the maximum loan-to-value ratios used to qualify borrowers; and (iii) the appraisals of the properties underlying the mortgages.

On October 19, 2010, the Court issued an order denying the plaintiffs' Motion to Intervene and granted the defendants' motion, thereby dismissing the case with prejudice.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6189
Sector: Financial
Industry: Regional Banks


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities Trust
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: WFC
COMPANY WEBSITE: www.wellsfargo.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
First Star Bank, et al. v. , : Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities Trust et al.
 COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 10-CV-3508
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Richard Seeborg
 DATE FILED: 08/10/2010  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 09/20/2006  CLASS PERIOD END: 08/10/2010
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy (Burlingame)
      840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200, Burlingame, CA, 94010
       (voice) 650.697.600, (fax) 650.697.600,
  • Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (Berkeley)
      715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202, Berkeley, CA, 94710
       (voice) 510.725.3000, (fax) 510.725.3000, info@hbsslaw.com
  • Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP New Seattle
      1918 Eighth Ave. Suite 3300, Seattle, WA, 98101
       (voice) 206.623.7292, (fax) 206.623.0594,
  • Levetown & Jenkins, LLP
      700 12th Streert, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, ,
       (voice) (202) 379-4899, (fax) ,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  4

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations Of The Securities Act Of 1933
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 08/10/2010
    Tentative Order Granting Underwriter Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Order Date on the document: 10/05/2010
    Order Granting Underwriter Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Order Date on the document: 10/19/2010
    Plaintiffs' Notice Of Appeal To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
    Type: Notice of Appeal Date on the document: 10/25/2010
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 11/29/2010

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top