Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Duoyuan Global Water, Inc.
Summary: According to the complaint filed on September 20, 2010, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose, among others: (1) that, due to the substantial interconnection between Duoyuan Global Water and DYP, the existence of accounting improprieties and ineffective internal controls at DYP could negatively impact Duoyuan Global Water; and (2) that, as a result, the Defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their statements about Duoyuan Global Water, its business, operations, prospects, and growth.

On March 3, 2011, Judge George B. Daniels signed the order granting the motion to appoint Hoi Ming Michael Ho and Joseph E. Sciarro to serve as lead plaintiffs. The law firm Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP was approved as lead counsel for the Class. On June 15, 2011, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint.

On August 11, 2011, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a Corrected Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws.

On August 24, 2012, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision and Order. The motions to dismiss of certain defendants were granted, while the motions of other defendants were denied.

According to the November 8, 2012 Order, Defendant BDO HK was dismissed without prejudice from this action.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3550
Sector: Capital Goods
Industry: Misc. Capital Goods


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Duoyuan Global Water, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: DGW
COMPANY WEBSITE: www.duoyuan-hq.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Mingli Li, et al. v. Duoyuan Global Water, Inc., et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 10-CV-07233
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. George B. Daniels
 DATE FILED: 09/20/2010  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 11/09/2009  CLASS PERIOD END: 09/13/2010
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP (Los Angeles)
      1801 Ave. of the Stars, Suite 311, Los Angeles, CA, 90067
       (voice) 310.201.915, (fax) 310. 201-916, info@glancylaw.com
  • Law Offices of Howard G. Smith
      3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, PA, 19020
       (voice) 215.638.4847, (fax) 215.638.4867,
  • Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP (Chicago)
      10 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505, Chicago, IL, 60603
       (voice) 312.377.1181, (fax) 312.377.1181,
  • Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP (New York)
      100 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY, 10017-5516
       (voice) 212.661.1100, (fax) 212.661.8665, info@pomerantzlaw.com/
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  4

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 09/20/2010
    Order Granting Motion Of Hoi Ming Michael And Joseph F. Sciarro For Appointment As Lead Plaintiff And Approval Of Lead Counsel
    Type: Order Appointing LP/LC Date on the document: 03/03/2011

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Mingli Li, et al. v. Duoyuan Global Water, Inc., et al.
     COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 10-CV-07233
     JUDGE NAME: 
     DATE FILED: 06/15/2011  SOURCE: 
     CLASS PERIOD START: 11/09/2009  CLASS PERIOD END: 09/13/2010
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Labaton Sucharow LLP
      140 Broadway, New York, NY, 10005
       (voice) 212.907.0700, (fax) 212.818.0477, info@labaton.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Other Date on the document: 06/15/2011
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 06/15/2011
    Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/04/2011
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Other Date on the document: 11/22/2011
    Memorandum Decision And Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 08/24/2012
    Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
    Type: Order Date on the document: 11/08/2012

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top