![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Duoyuan Global Water, Inc. Summary: According to the complaint filed on September 20, 2010, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose, among others: (1) that, due to the substantial interconnection between Duoyuan Global Water and DYP, the existence of accounting improprieties and ineffective internal controls at DYP could negatively impact Duoyuan Global Water; and (2) that, as a result, the Defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their statements about Duoyuan Global Water, its business, operations, prospects, and growth. On March 3, 2011, Judge George B. Daniels signed the order granting the motion to appoint Hoi Ming Michael Ho and Joseph E. Sciarro to serve as lead plaintiffs. The law firm Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP was approved as lead counsel for the Class. On June 15, 2011, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint. On August 11, 2011, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a Corrected Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws. On August 24, 2012, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision and Order. The motions to dismiss of certain defendants were granted, while the motions of other defendants were denied. According to the November 8, 2012 Order, Defendant BDO HK was dismissed without prejudice from this action. INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION: SIC Code: 3550 Sector: Capital Goods Industry: Misc. Capital Goods
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful. Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||