China Green Agriculture, Inc. - Securities Class Action

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

China Green Agriculture, Inc. Summary: According to a press release dated October 15, 2010, during the Class Period, Defendants misled investors about the quality and nature of China Green's reported financial statements.

The Complaint also alleges that the Company's fiscal 2010 financial statements filed with the SEC are materially false and misleading. In fact, China Green's comparable 2010 financial statements filed with Chinese authorities materially differed from the financial results set forth in the Company's SEC filings. China Green's false and misleading statements during the Class Period inflated the price of the Company's securities. The Complaint asserts that when this adverse information was finally disclosed to the market, the price of the Company's securities dropped, damaging shareholders.

According to the Order entered on April 27, 2011, the motion to appoint the China Green Investor Group as Lead Plaintiff and Approve of Lead Plaintiffs Selection of Lead and Liaison Counsel was granted. The lead plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on June 13, 2011, expanding the alleged class period and naming certain company directors and underwriters as defendants in the action. The defendants filed several motions to dismiss on October 7, 2011.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 2870
Sector: Basic Materials
Industry: Chemical Manufacturing

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	China Green Agriculture, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	CGA
COMPANY WEBSITE:	www.cgagri.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

Frederic Elliot, et al. v. China Green Agriculture, Inc., et al.

COURT: D. Nevada	DOCKET NUMBER: 10-CV-00648
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Larry R. Hicks
DATE FILED: 10/15/2010	SOURCE:
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/12/2009	CLASS PERIOD END: 09/01/2010
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Bowen Hall 555 South Center Street, Reno, NV, 89501 (voice) (775) 323-8678, (fax) , Saxena White PA (Boca Raton) 2424 N. Federal Highway, Suite 257, Boca Raton, FL, 33431 (voice) 561.394.3399, (fax) 561.394.3399, _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 2

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Class Action Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 10/15/2010
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Appoint The China Green Investor Group As Lead Plaintiff And Approve Of Lead Plaintiff's Selection Of Lead And Liaison Counsel
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 12/14/2010
Minutes Of The Court
Type: Order Appointing LP/LC		Date on the document: 04/27/2011

REFERENCE COMPLAINT

Frederic Elliot, et al. v. China Green Agriculture, Inc., et al.

COURT: D. Nevada	DOCKET NUMBER: 10-CV-00648
JUDGE NAME:
DATE FILED: 06/13/2011	SOURCE:
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/12/2009	CLASS PERIOD END: 01/04/2010
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Amended
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Duke, Holzman, Photiadis & Gresens LLP 1800 Main Place Tower, 350 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14202 (voice) 716.855.1111, (fax) , _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 0

DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/13/2011
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 11/23/2011

OTHER DOCUMENTS

Case Name and/or Number:
Type:		Date on the document:

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�