Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


R.H. Donnelley Corporation
Summary: According to a press release dated October 23, 2009, the complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business and financial results. Defendants caused the Company to fail to properly account for its bad debt expense and timely write down its impaired goodwill.

As a result of defendants’ false and misleading statements, RH Donnelley’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, trading as high as $66.67 in July 2007. However, beginning in February 2008, defendants began to acknowledge problems in the Company’s operations and with its financial results. On March 12, 2009, RH Donnelley announced that it had retained a financial advisor to assist in the evaluation of its capital structure, including various balance sheet restructuring alternatives. Then, on May 29, 2009, RH Donnelley filed for bankruptcy. The stock now trades at around six cents per share.

According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by the defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, were as follows: (a) the Company was not adequately reserving for its bad debts in violation of GAAP, causing its financial results to be materially misstated; (b) the downward pressure the Company was experiencing with its advertising revenue was not exclusively due to cyclical challenges, as represented, but was also due to a permanent shift in customers moving away from print yellow pages advertising; (c) the Company had far greater exposure to liquidity concerns and ratings downgrades than it had previously disclosed; and (d) given the turmoil in the economy and the trends related to a shift away from print advertising, the Company had no reasonable basis to make projections about its 2008 results.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 0000
Sector:
Industry:


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: R.H. Donnelley Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: RHDCQ.PK
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.rhdonnelley.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Local 731 I.B. of T. Excavators and Pavers Pension Trust Fund, et al. v. Swanson, et al.
 COURT: D. Delaware  DOCKET NUMBER: 09-CV-00799
 JUDGE NAME: 
 DATE FILED: 10/23/2009  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 07/26/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 05/28/2009
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Cavanagh & O'Hara
      407 East Adams Street, Springfield, IL, 62701
       (voice) 217.544.1771, (fax) 217.544.1771,
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
      655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 619.231.1058, (fax) 619.231.7423, info@csgrr.com/
  • Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross & Goddess, P.A.
      Suite 1401, Mellon Bank Center, PO Box 1070, Wilmington, DE, 19899-0170
       (voice) , (fax) ,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/23/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top