Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. : Oppenheimer AMT-FREE Municipals Fund
Summary: Several class action complaints have been filed in the U.S. District Courts for the Districts of New Jersey and Colorado. Specifically, the complaints allege that Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. ("OFI") and certain of its Trustees violated the Securities Act of 1933 by issuing prospectuses which misled investors concerning the risks of investing in the Fund. These undisclosed risks are alleged to have been the cause of a severe decline in the value of the Fund's shares, far exceeding the decline of competing municipal bond funds.

The Fund employed strategies which enhanced its reported returns while, at the same time, exposing the Fund to a greater risk of price declines in the value of its portfolio securities in the event of any illiquidity in the market for municipal securities. However, in doing so, the prospectuses and other sales materials employed in selling and marketing the Fund failed to disclose that these very strategies exposed the Fund to substantially greater risk of loss due to the company being forced to sell large blocks of portfolio securities at disadvantageous times and prices reduced from those at which the securities were previously carried on the books.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 0000
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: OPTAX
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.oppenheimerfunds.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Mimi J. Furman, et al. v. Oppenheimer AMT-FREE Municipals Fund, et al.
 COURT: D. New Jersey  DOCKET NUMBER: 09-CV-02279
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. William J. Martini
 DATE FILED: 05/13/2009  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 05/08/2006  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/21/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (New York, One Pennsylvania Plaza)
      One Pennsylvania Plaza, Suite 1910, New York, NY, 10119
       (voice) 212.279.5050, (fax) 212.279.3655, JFruchter@FruchterTwersky.com
  • Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C.
      210 Summit Avenue, Montvale, NJ, 07645
       (voice) 201- 391-7000, (fax) 201-307-1086, kgg@kgglaw.com
  • Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
      6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017
       (voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint For Violations Of Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/13/2009
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 07/30/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws And Jury Demand
    Case Name and/or Number: Glenwood Prince, et al. v. Oppenheimer AMT-FREE Municipals Fund, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/28/2009
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws and Jury Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Modean Connel, et al. v. Oppenheimer AMT-FREE Municipals Fund, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/19/2009

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top