Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


The9, Ltd.
Summary: According to a press release dated October 21, 2009, the complaint charges The9 and certain directors and officers of The9 with violations of the Exchange Act. The9 is an online game operator and developer in China. According to the complaint, during the Class Period, the Company, directly and through its affiliates and/or subsidiaries, operated licensed massively multiplayer online role-playing games (“MMORPGs”) and advanced casual games in China, including World of Warcraft (“WoW”), Soul of The Ultimate Nation, Granado Espada, EA SPORTS FIFA Online 2, and Atlantica. It also operated other licensed games in mainland China, including Audition 2 and Field of Honor.

The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, defendants made numerous positive statements regarding the Company’s financial condition, business and prospects. The complaint further alleges that these statements were inaccurate statements of material fact when made because defendants failed to disclose that: (i) it was becoming increasingly less likely that the Company would be renewing the WoW contract with Blizzard; (ii) The9 had not even begun formal negotiations with Blizzard regarding the contract renewal; (iii) The9 and Blizzard had been at odds regarding The9’s operation of WoW in China; and (iv) the equity investment by EA in The9 had made it less likely that Blizzard would renew the WoW contract because Blizzard would essentially be doing business with one of its greatest competitors.

On July 15, 2009, The9 reported a $36.9 million – or 72% – reduction in net income for 2008 from $51.1 million in net income that it had reported for that period on February 23, 2009. Moreover, The9 admitted that it had not even begun negotiations with Blizzard concerning the renewal of the WoW contract as of the date that it had previously represented to investors. In response to this news, shares of The9’s stock dropped 18% to $8.34.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7389
Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: The9, Ltd.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: NCTY
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.the9.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Lawrence F. Glaser, et al. v. The9, Ltd., et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 09-CV-08904
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Richard J. Holwell
 DATE FILED: 10/21/2009  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 11/15/2006  CLASS PERIOD END: 07/15/2009
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
  • Walden Law Firm PLLC
      8201 Cantrell Rd, Suite 315, Little Rock, AR, 72227
       (voice) 501.748.4832, (fax) 501.748.4832,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/21/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top