Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers
Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Hansen Medical, Inc.
Summary: According to a press release dated October 26, 2009, the lawsuit alleges Hansen Medical and certain of its officers violated federal securities laws. According to the complaint, the Company misstated its revenues and financial results during the Class Period in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3842
Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Medical Equipment & Supplies

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Hansen Medical, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: HNSN
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.hansenmedical.com
FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Robert Curry, et al. v. Hansen Medical, Inc., et al.
 COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 09-CV-05094
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Jeremy Fogel
 DATE FILED: 10/23/2009  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 05/01/2008  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/18/2009
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Holzer Holzer & Fistel, LLC (Atlanta)
      200 Ashford Center North, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA, 30338
       (voice) 770.392.0090, (fax) 770.392.0090,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

    •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Type:  Date on the document: 

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Case Name and/or Number: David C. Livingstone, et al. v. Hansen Medical, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 11/04/2009
    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top