Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Oppenheimer Pennsylvania Municipal Fund : PA Municipal A, B, C
Summary: According to a press release dated April 29, 2009, the complaint alleges that the Pennsylvania Fund, Oppenheimer Funds and certain of its officers and trustees violated the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940 by departing from the stated investment premise and otherwise injured Fund shareholders. The Pennsylvania Fund is a municipal bond fund yielding interest income exempt from federal and Pennsylvania income taxes. The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, the Registration Statements and Prospectuses misled investors about the Fund's investment objectives, policies and the underlying risk by characterizing its investments as consistent with preservation of capital. In fact, the Fund lost over 33% of its net asset value ("NAV") in 2008 compared with an average peer group loss of approximately 9.5%. The complaint alleges that capital preservation was disregarded as the Fund significantly increased exposure through excessively risky strategies not properly disclosed to investors.

Specifically, the overarching principle of capital preservation was compromised by concentrating large positions in low rated bonds, bonds not reviewed by an independent rating agency and by portfolio concentration in high risk securities including, Tobacco Bonds, Dirt Bonds, and Inverse Floaters.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 0000
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Oppenheimer Pennsylvania Municipal Fund
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: OPATX
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.oppenheimerfunds.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
John R. Woods, et al. v. Oppenheimer Pennsylvania Municipal Fund, et al.
 COURT: W.D. Pennsylvania  DOCKET NUMBER: 09-CV-00514
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Joy Flowers Conti
 DATE FILED: 04/28/2009  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 11/28/2005  CLASS PERIOD END: 11/28/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP
      501 West Broadway, Suit 1250, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 877.493.5366, (fax) 619.238.5425,
  • Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP
      275 Madison Ave 34th Flr, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.682.1818, (fax) 212.682.1892, email@murrayfrank.com
  • Specter, Specter, Evans & Manogue
      Koppers Building, 26th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219
       (voice) 412.642.2300, (fax) ,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/28/2009
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 07/20/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws and Demand for Jury Trial
    Case Name and/or Number: Daniel Egts, et al. v. Oppenheimer Pennsylvania Municipal Fund, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/12/2009
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Michael P. Wunderly, et al. v. Oppenheimer Pennsylvania Municipal Fund, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/15/2009

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top