Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Oppenheimer New Jersey Municipal Fund : Class A,B,C
Summary: According to a press release dated April 24, 2009, the complaint alleges that the Fund and certain of its trustees and officers and also Oppenheimer Funds, Inc., violated sections of the Securities Act of 1933, which prohibits materially false and misleading statements in registration statements and prospectuses of the kind used to sell shares in the Fund.

In addition, the Fund failed to disclose that its use of derivative instruments known as "inverse floaters" which, under certain conditions, could (and did) effectively force the Fund to sell securities from its portfolio regardless of market conditions. In or around October 2008, the Fund filed a prospectus supplement alerting investors of the true risks of its investments -- the same risks that existed in 2006, 2007, and throughout 2008. By October 2008, however, those risks had already manifested themselves dealing substantial losses to investors causing shares to lose approximately 30% of their net asset value between January 2008 and October 2008.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code:
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Oppenheimer New Jersey Municipal Fund
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: ONJAX
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.oppenheimerfunds.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Rania Baladi, et al. v. Oppenheimer New Jersey Municipal Fund, et al.
 COURT: D. New Jersey  DOCKET NUMBER: 09-CV-01959
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. William J. Martini
 DATE FILED: 04/24/2009  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 04/24/2006  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/21/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (New York, 42 Street)
      60 East 42 Street, New York, NY, 10021
       (voice) 212.687.6655, (fax) ,
  • Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C.
      210 Summit Avenue, Montvale, NJ, 07645
       (voice) 201- 391-7000, (fax) 201-307-1086, kgg@kgglaw.com
  • Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
      6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017
       (voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/24/2009
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 07/30/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Case Name and/or Number: Marlene Seybold, et al. v. Oppenheimer New Jersey Municipal Fund, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/05/2009
    Class Action Complaint For Violation of the Federal Securities Laws and Jury Demand
    Case Name and/or Number: Peter Unanue, et al. v. Oppenheimer New Jersey Municipal Fund, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/16/2009

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top