Lehman Brothers, Inc. : Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

Lehman Brothers, Inc. : Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Summary: The class action was originally filed by plaintiff New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund on or about July 23, 2008 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. On July 29, 2008, the action was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of all purchasers of Lehman XS Trust Mortgage Pass-through Certificates who purchased said certificates pursuant or traceable to the common Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2005. The lawsuit asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misstatements and omissions in connection with the offering regarding the collateral underlying the certificates.

According to Pretrial Order No. 1 issued on January 9, 2009, the following actions are consolidated for all pretrial purposes with 08 Civ. 5523 (LAK): 08 Civ. 5523, 08 Civ. 8225, 08 Civ. 9404, 08 Civ. 9578, 08 Civ. 9793, 08 Civ. 10008 , 08 Civ. 10058, and 08 Civ. 10206. They are referred to collectively as In re Lehman Brothers Equity/Debt Securities Litigation. The following actions are consolidated for all purposes into 08 Civ. 6762 (LAK), and the caption of that action is amended to be In re Lehman Brothers Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation: 08 Civ. 6762 and 08 Civ. 10686. In re Lehman Brothers Equity/Debt Securities Litigation (08 Civ. 5523 (LAK)), In re Lehman Brothers Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation (08 Civ. 6762) (LAK) and In re Lehman Brothers ERISA Litigation (08 Civ. 5598 (LAK)) are consolidated for discovery purposes under master docket under 1:21-mc-00104-LAK. The Local 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust and Christopher Lometti of the firm of Schoengold, Sporn, Laitman & Lometti, P.C., are designated Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel in In re Lehman Brothers Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation.

On February 02, 2009, an amended complaint was filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants in this matter.

On February 03, 2010, an order by the court was entered granting the defendants motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint against them.

On February 04, 2010, a judgment entered into the record in favor of the defendants.

According to an Opinion dated April 13, 2011, Movants’ motions to intervene were granted with respect to (1) Movant Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi’s Section 12(a)(2) claims relating to its purchase of FFMLT 2006-FFB Certificates and (2) Movant Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System’s Section 12(a)(2) claims relating to its purchase of SASC 2007-BC1 and SARM 2006-4 Certificates. The motions were denied in all other respects.

On May 12, 2011, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Lead Plaintiffs dismissed this action with prejudice only as to certain Defendants.

On May 12, 2011, a Notice of Appeal was filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the Court's Order denying the Intervenors the right to assert further Securities Act claims. The District Court's Judgment was later affirmed by the Mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals entered on June 1, 2011.

On May 29, 2011, the Intervenors voluntarily dismissed the action with prejudice against certain defendants named in the action.

According to the Clerk's Judgment entered on June 27, 2011, for the reasons stated in the Court's Memo Endorsed Order dated June 22, 2011, the motion is granted; accordingly, as there is no just reason for delay pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), judgment is entered only as to the claims dismissed by this Court's Order issued on April 13, 2011.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6189
Sector: Financial
Industry: Misc. Financial Services

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	Lehman Brothers, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	LEHMQ
COMPANY WEBSITE:	http://www.lehman.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, et al. v. Lehman XS Trust Series 2005-5N, et al.

COURT: S.D. New York	DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-06762
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan
DATE FILED: 07/29/2008	SOURCE:
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/26/2005	CLASS PERIOD END: 01/31/2008
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Schoengold Sporn Laitman & Lometti PC 19 Fulton Street, Suite 406, New York, NY, 10038 (voice) 212.964.0046, (fax) 212.267-8137, shareholderrelations@spornlaw.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 1

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Notice of Removal
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 07/29/2008
Pretrial Order No. 1
Type: Order of Consolidation		Date on the document: 01/09/2009
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 01/09/2009

REFERENCE COMPLAINT

In re: Lehman Brothers Securities and ERISA Litigation

COURT: S.D. New York	DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-06762
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan
DATE FILED: 02/23/2009	SOURCE:
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/16/2005	CLASS PERIOD END: 01/27/2008
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Consolidated
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Schoengold Sporn Laitman & Lometti PC 19 Fulton Street, Suite 406, New York, NY, 10038 (voice) 212.964.0046, (fax) 212.267-8137, shareholderrelations@spornlaw.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 1

DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
Consolidated Securities Class Action Complaint
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 02/22/2009
Notice Of Motion
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 04/27/2009
Notice Of Motion
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 04/27/2009
Appearances
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/26/2010
Memorandum Opinion
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 02/01/2010
Pretrial Order No. 13
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/03/2010
Judgment
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/04/2010
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 02/05/2010
Memorandum Opinion
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 02/17/2010
Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/24/2010
Notice Of Appeal
Type: Notice of Appeal		Date on the document: 03/01/2010
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 04/13/2011
Notice Of Appeal
Type: Notice of Appeal		Date on the document: 05/12/2011
Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant To Rule 41(A)(1)
Type: Other		Date on the document: 05/12/2011
Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 05/29/2011
Judgment
Type: Summary Judgment		Date on the document: 06/27/2011
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 06/27/2011

OTHER DOCUMENTS
Docket Entry #1
Case Name and/or Number: Alaska Electric Pension Fund, et al. v. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/09/2008
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Case Name and/or Number: Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, et al. v. Lehman Brothers Holding Inc. et al.
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 01/09/2009
Notice Of Removal
Case Name and/or Number: In re: Lehman Brothers Securities and ERISA Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/04/2010
Mandate
Case Name and/or Number: In re: Lehman Brothers Mortgage-Back Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/01/2011

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�