 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Taleo Corporation Summary: According to a press release dated November 17, 2008, a class action lawsuit was filed naming Taleo Corporation, ("Taleo") (NASDAQ: TLEO) and officers and directors of Taleo as defendants.
Specifically, the Complaint alleges that defendants misled or failed to inform the investing public regarding the Company's historical and current accounting practices with respect to the timing for recognition of application and consulting revenues under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"). These policies, which reflected an inappropriate application of GAAP designed to accelerate the recognition of revenues, had been part of a scheme to defraud investors since the Company's initial public offering in October 2005. As a result of this acceleration of revenues, Taleo was able to present to investors a rosier picture of its financial condition than the appropriate revenue figures would have depicted. When the truth was revealed to the market, the price of Taleo common stock dropped $3.06, or 28 percent, to $7.99.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7372
Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Taleo Corporation |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | TLEO |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.taleo.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Brett Johnson, et al. v. Taleo Corporation, et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Class Action Complaint | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 11/14/2008 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 11/14/2008 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Class Action Complaint | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Terrence Popyk, et al. v. Taleo Corporation, et al. | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 12/17/2008 | ||
| Class Action Complaint | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Scott Stemper and Molly Martin, et al. v. Taleo Corporation, et al. | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 01/13/2009 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top