Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Internap Network Services Corporation
Summary: According to a press release dated November 14, 2008, the complaint charges the Company and its Chief Executive Officer with violations of the Exchange Act. Internap provides Internet connectivity solutions to business customers who require business applications such as e-commerce, video and audio streaming, customer relationship management, voice over Internet protocol, virtual private networks, and supply chain management.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's alleged successful integration of acquired businesses into its network and that such integration purportedly improved performance for customers, helped increase the Company's customer base and resulted in record revenues. According to the complaint, however, the company allegedly hid from the public that its customers were experiencing sever network outages and that several hundred customers had requested account credits. The complaint alleges that because of defendants' false and misleading statements, Internap's stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period. On March 18, 2008, the Company announced, inter alia, that it would delay filing its Form 10-K Annual Report, that it would send refunds to several hundred customers and that service outages caused a reduction of revenue and caused customers to request credits. On the following day, March 19, 2008, Internap's stock price plummeted from $6.12 per share to a closing price of $4.09 per share, a decline of approximately 33%.

On August 12, 2009, an amended complaint was filed with the court by the plaintiffs.

On November 06, 2009, a corrected amended complaint was filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7370
Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Internap Network Services Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: INAP
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.internap.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Catherine Anastasio, et al. v. Internap Network Services Corporation, et al.
 COURT: N.D. Georgia  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-03462
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Owen Forrester
 DATE FILED: 11/12/2008  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 03/28/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 03/18/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (New York, One Pennsylvania Plaza)
      One Pennsylvania Plaza, Suite 1910, New York, NY, 10119
       (voice) 212.279.5050, (fax) 212.279.3655, JFruchter@FruchterTwersky.com
  • Page Perry LLC
      1040 Crown Pointe Parkway; Suite 1050, Atlanta, GA, 30338
       (voice) 877.673.0047, (fax) 877.673.0047, attorneys@pageperry.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 11/12/2008
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 11/12/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top