Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


State Street Corporation: SSgA Intermediate Fund
Summary: The original complaint alleges that defendants solicited investors to purchase shares of the Intermediate Fund by making statements in its registration statement and subsequent supplemental prospectuses that described the Fund's objective as one that "seeks a high level of current income while preserving principal by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of debt securities with a dollar-weighted average maturity between three and ten years." Moreover, the registration statement represented that the investment objective of the Intermediate Fund was to invest "at least 80% of its total assets in debt instruments" and to invest in "debt instruments rated investment grade or better."

As alleged in the complaint, these statements, among others, were materially false and misleading because they omitted and/or misrepresented the true facts, including: (a) the actual risks associated with acquiring shares of the Intermediate Fund; (b) that the Intermediate Fund: (i) was heavily invested in high-risk mortgage-backed securities and/or securities tied to the value of subprime mortgages; and (ii) had vast undisclosed exposure to the subprime lending industry; and (c) that the Fund had materially altered its investment strategy, which had resulted in the dramatic deterioration in the quality of the Fund's investment. As a result of defendants' investment strategy, the Intermediate Fund suffered declines of more than 50% by September 2007.

On October 24, 2008, it was ordered that this case be coordinated with Multidistrict Litigation No. 1945 for pretrial purposes only. On February 13, 2009, an Amended Complaint was filed. On August 17, 2009, the Court entered the Order signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell. According to the Order, on January 15, 2009, the Court granted the motion 15 of Plumbers and Steamfitters Union Local No. 10 Health & Welfare Fund to be appointed to serve as lead plaintiff, and further approved Plumbers and Steamfitters' choice of counsel. As a housekeeping matter, the Clerk is directed to mark this motion closed.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6022
Sector: Financial
Industry: Regional Banks


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: State Street Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: SSINX
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.statestreet.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Plumbers And Steamfitters Union Local No. 10 Health And Welfare Fund, et al. v. State Street Corporation, et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-07934
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Richard J. Holwell
 DATE FILED: 09/11/2008  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 09/11/2005  CLASS PERIOD END: 09/11/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (NY)
      200 Broadhollow Road, Suite 406, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631-367-7100, (fax) 631-367-1173, info@csgrr.com/
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 9/11/2008
    Order
    Type: Order of Consolidation Date on the document: 10/08/2008
    Order
    Type: Other Date on the document: 10/24/2008

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Plumbers And Steamfitters Union Local No. 10 Health And Welfare Fund, et al. v. , et al.
     COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-07934
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. Richard J. Holwell
     DATE FILED: 02/13/2009  SOURCE: 
     CLASS PERIOD START: 09/12/2005  CLASS PERIOD END: 09/11/2008
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Amended
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Amended Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/13/2009
    Order
    Type: Order Appointing LP/LC Date on the document: 08/17/2009
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 08/17/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top