Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


MRV Communications, Inc.
Summary: According to a law firm press release, a class action has been commenced on behalf of purchasers of MRV Communications, Inc. common stock during the period between March 31, 2003 and June 5, 2008 (the "Class Period"). The complaint charges MRV and certain of its current and former officers with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

MRV is a supplier of communications equipment and services to carriers, governments and enterprise customers worldwide. The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements concerning the Company's employee stock option grant practices and financial results. Defendants allegedly caused or allowed MRV to issue statements that failed to disclose or misstated the following: (i) that the Company had problems with its internal controls that prevented it from issuing accurate financial reports and projections; (ii) that because of improperly recorded stock-based compensation expenses the Company's financial results violated GAAP; and (iii) that the Company's public disclosures covering a seven-year period presented an inflated view of MRV's earnings and earnings per share, which would later have to be restated. On June 5, 2008, MRV announced that it expects to restate its 2002 to 2008 financial statements, and that its previously-issued financial statements, earnings press releases, and similar communications should no longer be relied upon. The restatement relates to the previously undisclosed stock-option backdating problems and related accounting issues. This report came after the Company had earlier announced that a review of its options granting practices had found no evidence that grant dates were designed to occur on dates with lower, more favorable exercise prices. MRV's management now states that it is likely that these previous conclusions were incorrect. Upon disclosure of this news, MRV's share price plummeted approximately 24%.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3674
Sector: Technology
Industry: Semiconductors


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: MRV Communications, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: MRVC
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.mrv.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
ZVI Anits, et al. v. MRV Communications, Inc., et al.
 COURT: C.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-04472
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. George P. Schiavelli
 DATE FILED: 7/8/2008  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 3/31/2003  CLASS PERIOD END: 6/5/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Dyer & Berens LLP
      682 Grant Street, Denver, CO, 80203-3507
       (voice) 303.861.1764, (fax) 303.861.1764,
  • Milberg LLP (Los Angeles)
      300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3900 , Los Angeles, CA, 90071
       (voice) 213.617.1200, (fax) 213.617.1200, ContactUs@milberg.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 6/8/2008
    US District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 7/11/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top