Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


MF Global, Ltd.
Summary: On December 30, 2008, an Order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss and denying the plaintiffs motion to appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel.

The complaint charges MF Global and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. MF Global is a broker of exchange-listed futures and options.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's capital and financial results and concealed the material deterioration in the Company's business and the insufficiency of its capital, which would necessitate additional offerings of securities and dilution of the ownership interest of MF Global investors. As a result of defendants' false statements, MF Global stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $14.98 per share in May 2008.

On June 17, 2008, MF Global issued a press release announcing its intention to sell approximately $300 million in convertible stock and bonds to repay a bridge loan due in December and updating its current fiscal first quarter 2009 earnings estimates. The expected revenues were well below the levels MF Global's management had led the market to expect just weeks earlier. As a result of this news, MF Global's stock dropped to close at $7.83 per share on June 18, 2008, a decline of 43% from June 17, 2008.

On June 19, 2008, The Wall Street Journal published an article regarding the Company's planned $300 million offering and its other recent problems, including a probe by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission alleging one of the Company's brokers colluded with a trader at the Bank of Montreal to set natural-gas prices and speculation about its liquidity position and the desertion of clients. On this news, MF Global's stock dropped to $6.86 per share on June 20, 2008, a decline of 55% from the Class Period high of $14.98 per share in May 2008.

According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by the defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, were as follows: (a) MF Global's business was materially weaker than represented and the Company would not be able to achieve the 15%-20% revenue growth projected for fiscal 2009; and (b) MF Global's capital would not be sufficient absent additional infusions which would dilute the ownership of current shareholders.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6200
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: MF Global, Ltd.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: MF
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.mfglobal.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Pollio, et al. v. MF Global, Ltd., et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-06858
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Jed S. Rakoff
 DATE FILED: 07/31/2008  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 03/17/2008  CLASS PERIOD END: 06/20/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      200 Broadhollow, Suite 406, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
  • Weiss & Lurie (New York)
      551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600, New York, NY, 10176
       (voice) (212)682-3025, (fax) (212)682-3010, info@wllawny.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 7/31/2008
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 8/1/2008
    Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 12/30/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top