![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) Summary: The origina class action alleging violations of the federal securities law against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:FRE) ("Freddie Mac" or the "Company") and certain of its officers and directors on behalf of purchasers of Freddie Mac securities from November 21, 2007 through August 5, 2008 was filed on August 15, 2008. The Complaint alleges that the Company misled investors as to the soundness of the Company's mortgage portfolio, its underwriting standards and the adequacy of its capital. It took on massive exposure to subprime and other non-traditional risky loans and under-reserved for bad loans and sub-prime investments leading to delayed asset write-downs. Freddie Mac common shares which traded in the $30 range in late 2007 have been decimated by the subsequent revelations of the Company's losses and write-downs, so that Freddie Mac common shares are now trading below $6, wiping out hundreds of millions of dollars in shareholder value. Due to the continuing deteriorating situation, there have been suggestions that a government bail-out might be necessary. On November 24, 2008, Judge John F. Keenan signed the Opinion and Order #96784 granting the motion to appoint the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund as lead plaintiff and approved lead plaintiff’s choice of Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP as lead counsel. In February 2009, orders were entered allowing for a motion to stay. On May 19, 2009, the lead plaintiff filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint. The defendants have yet to file a response to the complaint. INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION: SIC Code: 6111 Sector: Financial Industry: Consumer Financial Services
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful. Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||