Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Absolute Capital Management Holdings
Summary: On October 21, 2008, a motion to dismiss was filed with the court for lack of jurisdiction by the defendants.

According to the complaint, filed on June 30, 2008, this case concerns an international fraudulent securities scheme based on the illicit purchases of hundreds of millions of dollars of securities in illiquid U.S. penny stocks in the names of multiple Absolute Capital hedge funds. When the truth about these purchases was revealed in September 2007, the value of the hedge funds promptly plunged by up to 40%, or by hundreds of millions of dollars in the aggregate.

In September 2007, the Chief Investment Officer of Return Europe Fund, East West Fund, European Catalyst Fund, Octane Fund, Activist Fund and other funds within the Absolute Capital family of funds suddenly disappeared. Similarly, the Chairman and CEO suddenly resigned. As reported in the press, "many Absolute investors found themselves looking at big losses after it emerged in the days after the CIO’s disappearance that a substantial amount of his holdings had been in bulletin board, or 'pink' sheet stocks." Stocks known as "bulletin board" stocks or "pink sheet" stocks are stocks in companies that cannot meet the requirements to be listed on a national securities exchange. Such stocks are universally recognized in the securities industry to be illiquid, thinly-traded, and speculative. They are often stocks in start-up companies. Such stocks are far more susceptible to market manipulation than stocks traded on a national exchange.

The "big losses" initially reported in the press were an understatement. In a September 19, 2007 press release by ACM, ACM revealed that the Absolute Capital Funds' investments in illiquid "US-based Over the Counter Bulletin Board/Pink Sheet" stocks were "approximately $440 million to $530 million of the equity funds' assets."

The sudden revelation that the missing CIO had invested roughly half a billion dollars in illiquid penny stocks, contrary to the provisions contained in the Funds' offering memoranda, caused the value of investments in the Absolute Capital Funds to plunge and to put ACM in a financial crisis.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6282
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Absolute Capital Management Holdings
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: AMGHF
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.abcapman.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
The Cascade Fund LLLP, et al. v. Capital Management Holdings Limited, et al.
 COURT: D. Colorado  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-01381
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Marcia S. Krieger
 DATE FILED: 06/30/2008  SOURCE: 
 CLASS PERIOD START: 06/30/2005  CLASS PERIOD END: 06/30/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C.
      One South Broad Street - Suite 2100, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
       (voice) 215.238.1700, (fax) 215.238.1960, info@kohnswift.com
  • Sander Ingebretsen & Parish, P.C.
      633 17th Street, Suite 1900, Denver, CO, 80202
       (voice) 303.285.5544, (fax) 303.285.5544, inquiry@siplaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 6/30/2008
    US District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 7/15/2008
    The Absolute Capital Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1), (2), and (6)
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 10/21/2008
    First Amended Complaint And Jury Demand
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/25/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top