Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Wachovia Corporation : Wachovia Capital Trust IX 6.375% Trust Preferred Securities
Summary: On February 29, 2008, the case was removed from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

According to the complaint originally filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, this is a securities class action on behalf of all persons who acquired the preferred stock of Wachovia Corporation pursuant and/or traceable to a false and misleading registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with the Company’s May 2007 offering of the Company’s 6.375% Trust Preferred Securities. This action asserts strict liability claims under the Securities Act of 1933 against Wachovia, its senior insiders, the Wachovia trust which issued the securities, and the investment banks which underwrote the May 2007 Offering.

Defendant Wachovia is registered as a financial holding company and a bank holding company, and provides commercial and retail banking and trust services through full-service banking offices. Wachovia is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina and has branch offices in the United State and around the globe.

Defendants consummated Wachovia’s Offering pursuant to the false and misleading Registration Statement, selling 30 million shares at $25 per share, for proceeds of approximately $750 million.

Wachovia ultimately announced huge charges associated with its mortgage portfolio, causing the price of Wachovia’s common stock and the preferred securities issued in the Offering to decline.

The true facts which were omitted from the Registration Statement were: (a) Defendants’ portfolio of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) contained billions of dollars worth of impaired and risky securities, many of which were backed by subprime mortgage loans; (b) Defendants failed to properly account for highly levered loans such as mortgage securities; and (c) Wachovia had been heavily involved in mortgages involving the pay-option adjustable rate mortgage (ARMs). These pay-option ARMs provided that, during the initial term of the loan, borrowers could pay only as much as they desired with any underpayment being added to the loan balance. These loans would become toxic (for both Wachovia and the borrowers) once house prices stopped increasing at a rapid rate.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6021
Sector: Financial
Industry: Money Center Banks


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Wachovia Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: WB
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.wachovia.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Arlette Miller, et al. v. Wachovia Corporation, et al.
 COURT: E.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-00879
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Joanna Seybert
 DATE FILED: 2/29/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 5/1/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 5/1/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky
      60 East 42 Street, New York, NY, 10021
       (voice) 212.687.6655, (fax) ,
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
      655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 619.231.1058, (fax) 619.231.7423, info@csgrr.com/
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Notice of Removal
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 02/29/2008
    US District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 5/19/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top