Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Summary: According to press release dated March 13, 2008, the complaint charges Vertex and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Vertex is a pharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery, development and commercialization of small molecule drugs for the treatment of serious diseases.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements about the development of Vertex' s HCV protease inhibitor, telaprevir or VX-950, for the treatment of hepatitis C. Specifically, defendants made favorable statements regarding VX-950 but failed to disclose unfavorable data from a trial of the drug called PROVE 2. When the truth was disclosed on November 2, 2007, Vertex' s stock price dropped from $31.64 to $24.08 in two trading days.

According to the complaint, defendants' statements regarding VX-950 and the PROVE 2 trial were materially false and misleading because they failed to disclose unfavorable data regarding VX-950 from the PROVE 2 trial compared to PROVE 1. Specifically, PROVE 1 showed that patients taking VX-950 experienced 16% greater total viral reduction after twelve weeks compared to the control group. The results of PROVE 2, which defendants did not disclose during the Class Period, showed an advantage over the control group of only six percent.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 2834
Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: VRTX
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.vpharm.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System, et al. v. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, et al.
 COURT: D. Massachusetts  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-10414
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Leo T. Sorokin
 DATE FILED: 3/13/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 6/12/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 11/2/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP
      52 State Street, Boston, MA, 02109
       (voice) 617.439.3939, (fax) 617.439.0134, info@shulaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 3/13/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Barbara J. Robinson, et al. v. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 4/18/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top