Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


The Maximum Financial Group, Inc.
Summary: On May 13, 2008, a motion to appoint Ropeta Group as lead plaintiff and to approve the selection of lead counsel was filed. The motion was granted in part, appointing the Ropeta Group as lead plaintiff and approving their choice of lead counsel pending a final decision relating to the certification of the class action.

According to a press release dated March 14, 2008, a class action has been commenced on behalf of a Class consisting of all persons who purchased unregistered securities from certain individuals, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation or GunnAllen Financial, Inc. (collectively, ``Defendants'') or otherwise acquired the common stock between January 1, 2000 and March 4, 2008 (the ``Class Period''), against Defendants and certain of its officers and/or directors for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1933. The complaint charges that Defendants sold unregistered securities to class members in violation of Sections 12(1), 12(2) and 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, and in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, Defendants sold class members unregistered securities in the form of interests in non-existent limited liability companies (``LLCs'') created by Defendant May and sold by Defendant Bluestein, through The Maximum Financial Group, Inc. and with the assistance of broker-dealer Defendants Questar Capital Corporation and GunnAllen Financial, Inc., in violation of federal securities laws and state laws.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code:
Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: The Maximum Financial Group, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:
COMPANY WEBSITE:

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Donald E. Haase, et al. v. Frank J. Bluestein, et al.
 COURT: E.D. Michigan  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-10927
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Julian Abele Cook
 DATE FILED: 3/4/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 1/1/2000  CLASS PERIOD END: 12/31/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • J. Thompson & Associates PLC
      2000 Town Center, Suite 1000, Southfield, MI, 480975
       (voice) 248.436.8448, (fax) ,
  • Paul L. Nine & Associates PC
      100 W. Long Lake Road, Suite 102, Bloomfield Hills, MI, 48304
       (voice) 248.644.5500, (fax) ,
  • Sommers Schwartz, PC
      2000 Town Center, Suite 900, Southfield, MI, 480975
       (voice) 248.355.0300, (fax) 248.355.0300,
  • Zimmerman Reed, PLLP
      651 Nicollet Mall, Suite 501, Minneapolis, MN, 55402
       (voice) 612.341.0400 , (fax) 612.341.0844, info@zimmreed.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  4

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint and Jury Demand
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/04/2008
    Order
    Type: Order Appointing LP/LC Date on the document: 8/5/2008
    US District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 8/5/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top