![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Maximum Financial Group, Inc. Summary: On May 13, 2008, a motion to appoint Ropeta Group as lead plaintiff and to approve the selection of lead counsel was filed. The motion was granted in part, appointing the Ropeta Group as lead plaintiff and approving their choice of lead counsel pending a final decision relating to the certification of the class action. According to a press release dated March 14, 2008, a class action has been commenced on behalf of a Class consisting of all persons who purchased unregistered securities from certain individuals, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation or GunnAllen Financial, Inc. (collectively, ``Defendants'') or otherwise acquired the common stock between January 1, 2000 and March 4, 2008 (the ``Class Period''), against Defendants and certain of its officers and/or directors for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1933. The complaint charges that Defendants sold unregistered securities to class members in violation of Sections 12(1), 12(2) and 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, and in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, Defendants sold class members unregistered securities in the form of interests in non-existent limited liability companies (``LLCs'') created by Defendant May and sold by Defendant Bluestein, through The Maximum Financial Group, Inc. and with the assistance of broker-dealer Defendants Questar Capital Corporation and GunnAllen Financial, Inc., in violation of federal securities laws and state laws. INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION: SIC Code: Sector: Financial Industry: Consumer Financial Services
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful. Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||