Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


SunOpta, Inc.
Summary: According to a press release dated January 28, 2008, following the close of trading, defendants shocked investors after they published a release that revealed, for the first time, that the Company was performing well below expectations and that defendants expected to cause the Company to take a material restatement charge in the near term -- rending its prior reported financial statements and reports unreliable, false and materially misleading. SunOpta, which processes and produces organic foods, said it expected to post a profit of 12 cents to 14 cents per share for the year, citing issues within its fruit and BioProcess groups that led to pretax write-downs and provisions of $12 million to $14 million. Among problems the Company cited were inventories within the Company's Fruit Group's berry operations requiring write-down to net realizable value, whereby "preliminary estimates indicated that an adjustment in the range of $9 to $11 million for this issue and related items is necessary." Further, the Company disclosed a charge of "approximately $3 million pre-tax, related to difficulties in collecting for services and equipment provided to a customer under the terms of an existing equipment supply contract within the SunOpta BioProcess Group."

On this news, belatedly revealed on January 24, 2008, shares of SunOpta stock fell precipitously, collapsing over 40%, from a close of $9.50 per share to approximately $6.00 per share in the single trading day -- on very high trading volume of over 11.488 million shares traded.

Note: On January 28, 2008, the law firm of Federman & Sherwood announced that class period in its complaint was expanded to include those investors who bought or sold between May 8, 2007 to January 25, 2008.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 5150
Sector: Consumer Non-Cyclical
Industry: Crops


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: SunOpta, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: STKL
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.sunopta.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Troy Arden Juliar, et al. v. SunOpta, Inc., et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-00933
 JUDGE NAME: 
 DATE FILED: 1/28/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 8/8/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 1/25/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Brodsky & Smith, LLC
      11 Bala Avenue, Suite 39, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
       (voice) 610.668.7987., (fax) 610.660.0450, esmith@Brodsky-Smith.com
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
  • Federman & Sherwood
      120 North Robinson, Suite 2720, Oklahoma City, OK, 73102
       (voice) 405-235-1560, (fax) , wfederman@aol.com
  • Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC
      12 East 41st Street, 12th Floor, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.920.4310, (fax) 212.696.3730, info@kglg.com
  • Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (New York, NY)
      805 Third Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10022
       (voice) 212.687.1980, (fax) 212.687.7714, info@kaplanfox.com
  • Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein LLP
      Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco, CA, 94111-3339
       (voice) 415.956.1000, (fax) 415.956.1008,
  • Lionel Z. Glancy
      1801 Avenue of the Stars Suite 308, Los Angeles, CA, 90067
       (voice) 310.201.9150, (fax) ,
  • Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP
      275 Madison Ave 34th Flr, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.682.1818, (fax) 212.682.1892, email@murrayfrank.com
  • Scott & Scott LLC
      P.O. Box 192, 108 Norwich Avenue, Colchester, CT, 06415
       (voice) 860.537.5537, (fax) 860.537.4432, scottlaw@scott-scott.com
  • Smith & Smith LLP
      3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, PA, 19020
       (voice) 215.638.4847, (fax) 215.638.4867,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  10

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/28/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Stephen Strugala, et al. v. SunOpta, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/01/2008
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Ray Foster, et al. v. SunOpta, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/07/2008
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Roger Davidson, et al. v. SunOpta, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/13/2008
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Marie Lorenzato, et al. v. SunOpta, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/25/2008
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Robert Knox, et al. v. SunOpta, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/29/2008
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Albert Halegoua, et al. v. SunOpta, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/19/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top