Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Swiss Reinsurance Company
Summary: According to a press release dated February 27, 2008, the complaint charges Swiss Re and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Swiss Re is the world’s largest reinsurer with 70 offices in more than 25 countries.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company’s financial condition. Specifically, defendants failed to disclose that Swiss Re’s Credit Solutions unit had written two credit default swaps that exposed the Company to great financial risk. In a credit default swap, one party guarantees that a third party borrower will not default on a debt. In this case, Swiss Re guaranteed certain mortgage-backed securities which included some subprime and collateralized debt obligations. When the existence and nature of the credit default swaps was disclosed, Swiss Re’s stock price dropped from CHF97.55 to CHF87.55 (Swiss Francs) the next day.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code:
Sector: Financial
Industry: Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Swiss Reinsurance Company
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: RUKN
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.swissre.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Plumbers Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund, et al. v. Swiss Reinsurance Company, et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-01958
 JUDGE NAME: 
 DATE FILED: 02/27/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 05/08/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 11/19/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
      655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 619.231.1058, (fax) 619.231.7423, info@csgrr.com/
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/27/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top