Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc.
Summary: According to the complaint, as a direct result of the market learning of defendant's misrepresentations and omissions, the price of Lehman Brothers shares declined and plaintiff and the class suffered a loss on their investments in Lehman Brothers.

During the Class Period, Lehman Brothers was an active participant and heavily invested in the mortgage-backed securities markets.

By July 17, 2007, news of further deterioration in the mortgage-backed securities market and rumors concerning Lehman Brothers' mortgage related losses reached a critical stage. That day, Bear Stearns, a competing investment bank, announced that its "Structured Enhanced Leverage Fund," due to heavy losses in its mortgage-related investments, would be returning no money to its investors, and that a second failed mortgage securities-based hedge fund would be able to return only a small portion of its clients' funds.

This news sent shockwaves through the market, and led investors to suspect that Lehman Brothers was also concealing mortgage related losses on its balance sheet. On July 18, 2007, this speculation forced Lehman Brothers to reassure the market: a Company spokeswoman, Kerrie Cohen, said "[t]he rumors related to subprime [mortgage] exposure are unfounded."

Despite the Company's assurances, on July 30, 2007 an article published by Market Watch noted on that day that Standard & Poor's Equity Group downgraded Lehman Brothers, to hold from buy, "citing the brokerage's exposure to leverage in its fixed-income business, widening credit spreads and slower mortgage origination and securitization volume for mortgages."

This news shocked the market, causing Lehman Brothers' share price to drop over the next four trading days, to close on August 3, 2007, at $55.78 per share, a 14.56 percent drop from its closing price before the news of the Standard & Poor's downgrade.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6211
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: LEH
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.lehman.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Claude A. Reese, et al. v. O'Meara, et al.
 COURT: N.D. Illinois  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-1119
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. John F. Grady
 DATE FILED: 2/22/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 9/13/2006  CLASS PERIOD END: 7/30/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • O'Rourke Katten & Moody
      161 North Clark Street, Suite 2230, Chicago, IL,
       (voice) 312.849.2020, (fax) , info@okmlaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint for Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/22/2008
    US District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 3/4/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: Claude A. Reese, et al. v. O'Meara, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 4/29/2008
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons International Association Local 262 Annuity Fund, et al. v. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 6/18/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top