Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Humana, Inc.
Summary: According to a press release dated March 24, 2008, the complaint charges Humana and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company provides various health and supplemental benefit plans for employer groups, government benefit programs, and individuals in the United States.

According to the complaint, during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements concerning the Company’s anticipated earnings per share (“EPS”) for the first quarter of 2008 and full year 2008. As alleged in the complaint, these statements were materially false misleading because defendants failed to disclose: (i) that the Company was unable to properly calculate the prescription drug costs of its newly acquired members; (ii) that the Company’s costs associated with its prescription drug plans had dramatically increased; and (iii) that as a result of the foregoing, defendants’ statements concerning the Company’s anticipated EPS for the first quarter of 2008 and full year 2008 were lacking in a reasonable basis at all relevant times and were therefore materially false and misleading.

On March 12, 2008, the Company announced that it would be revising its earnings estimates because of, among other things, increased costs that it was experiencing with the Company’s prescription drug plans. Following this announcement, shares of Humana stock fell $6.50 per share, or approximately 13.7%, to close at $40.88 per share.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6324
Sector: Financial
Industry: Insurance (Accident & Health)


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Humana, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: HUM
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.humana.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Dominic Capuano, et al. v. Humana, Inc., et al.
 COURT: W.D. Kentucky  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-00162
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Joseph H. Mckinley, Jr.
 DATE FILED: 3/26/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 2/4/2008  CLASS PERIOD END: 3/11/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
  • Law Offices of Bernard M. Gross
      1515 Locust Street, 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19102
       (voice) 215-561-3600, (fax) 215-561-3000, bmgross@bernardmgross.com
  • Stewart Roelandt Stoess Craigmyle & Emery, PLLC
      6506 West Highway 22, P.O. Box 307, Crestwood, KY, 40014
       (voice) 502.241.4660, (fax) 502.241.4660,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/24/2008
    US District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 5/5/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Robert L. Lach, Trustee, et al. v. Humana, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 4/4/2008
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Vincent DiRusso, et al. v. Humana, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 4/8/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top