Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


EnerNOC, Inc.
Summary: According to the Complaint, Plaintiff brings this class action on behalf of all persons similarly situated, (the "Class"), other than Defendants and their affiliates, who (1) purchased or otherwise acquired the common shares of EnerNOC, Inc. ("EnerNOC" or the "Company) between November 1, 2007, through and including, February 27, 2008, (the "Class Period"); and/or (2) purchased or otherwise acquired EnerNOC common stock pursuant to Prospectus on Form 424B4 filed November 13, 2007 ("November 13 Prospectus") between November 13, 2007 through and including February 27, 2008, for violations of the federal securities laws. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused to the Class by Defendants' violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

Specifically, the complaint alleges that on November 1, 2007, EnerNOC announced its financial results for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2007. EnerNOC reported revenues of $19.1 million for the third quarter of 2007, compared to $11.0 million for the same period in 2006. Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, totaled $41.1 million. Cost of revenues for the third quarter of 2007 was $11.3 million, compared to $5.2 million for the same period in 2006. The Company represented that this was the highest quarterly revenue performance in Company history and that sales of EnerNOC’s demand response solutions accounted for substantially all of the third quarter revenue in both 2006 and 2007. These statements were materially false and misleading when made because Defendants knew, but failed to adequately reveal, that expenses were rising far faster than revenues creating a negative trend, and the increasing number of megawatts under management involved prolonged lags in the ability to recognize revenue.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7389
Sector: Services
Industry: Business Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: EnerNOC, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: ENOC
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.enernoc.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Matt Gunther, et al. v. EnerNOC, Inc., et al.
 COURT: D. Massachusetts  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-10361
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Rya W. Zobel
 DATE FILED: 3/4/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 11/1/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 2/27/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Abbey Spanier Rodd Abrams & Paradis, LLP
      212 East 39th Street, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212-889-3700, (fax) 212-684-519, info@abbeyspanier.com
  • Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo (MA)
      One Liberty Square, Boston, MA, 02109
       (voice) 617.542.8300, (fax) ,
  • Paskowitz & Associates
      60 East 42nd Street, 46th Floor, New York, NY, 10165
       (voice) 212.685.0969, (fax) 212.685.2306, classattorney@aol.com
  • Roy Jacobs & Associates
      350 Fifth Avenue Suite 3000 , New York, NY, 10118
       (voice) , (fax) , classattorney@pipeline.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  4

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/04/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Galen Calvert, et al. v. EnerNOC, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/06/2008
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Santiago Mulet, et al. v. EnerNOC, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/14/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top